Free Resources

We know the secret of your success

Characterization and Analysis of Algae and Biofuel Products

Introduction

Global warming is a major issue that will lead to several harms such as extreme weather conditions and sea-level rise (Peter, 2018). Increase in fossil fuel use results in high carbon dioxide emissions and contributes significantly to global warming. Measures to reduce fossil fuels use are under way for the past few decades via renewable energy development such as solar, wind, hydro and biofuels (Iqbal et al., 2019). While other energy forms could replace the fossil fuels in several sectors, higher fossil fuel energy use in transport sector could only be reduced by few substitution options among which biofuels are the most promising (Leiserowitz et al., 2020). With increase in policy reforms in the transport sector to replace fossil fuels by biofuels, there has been a tremendous interest in the development of biofuels across the world for the past two decades (Andersson et al., 2020). 

Biofuel use has shown a significant decline over time. More than 20 years ago, biofuel was depicted and championed to be the hope of renewable energy development. The Americas and Europe were significantly the largest producers of feedstock for biofuels during that time (Ruan et al., 2019). Everything changed at the turn of the 2010s when there was a major inflation in the cost of biofuel feedstock, leading to global outrage against the use of food sources as a means to satisfy the energy demand. Thus began debates on whether it is reasonable to use food substitutes as sources of renewable energy (Alizadeh et al., 2020).

Further technology development resulted to mass production and, of course more oil consumption. Disaster reduction or even checkout fossil fuel resources threatening the whole world in near future. In other side oil combustion increases greenhouse gases, Ozone layer depletion and environmental pollutants such as unburned hydrocarbons (UHC), Nitrogen compounds (NOx), Carbon monoxide (CO), Carbon dioxide (????????2) and of course respiratory disorders in large cities. In addition, dependency of consuming countries to oil exporting countries greatly increased and caused oil price boosting (Bos and Gupta, 2018).

Biofuels could be majorly derived from edible oil seed crops such as sunflower, palm, rapeseed, soybean, coconut, etc. which are considered as first-generation feedstock for biofuel production (Giakoumis, 2018). However, use of such feedstock for biodiesel production has received numerous backlash due to the fact that they compete with food production. The non-edible seed crops of various plants and waste cooking oil, grass, grease, animal fats, etc. have gained recent significance as second generation feedstock for the production of biofuels (Araujo et al., 2017).  However, these logical substitutes are not entirely sufficient to meet the global renewable energy demands (Negm et al., 2017). 

Thus, the third generation biofuels, which are derived from micro- and macro-algae have an edge over the previous two categories and the fourth generation biofuels are based on metabolic engineering of water flora, with a potential of fixing significant amounts of atmospheric Carbon dioxide when producing about a ton of  biomass (Chowdhury and Loganathan, 2019).

There is a recent global shift towards  microalgae as a third generation feedstock. This viability has been demonstrated in its high photosynthetic efficiency and significantly large biomass production. Microalgae do not compete for areas of vegetation and are quite prolific even under harsh geographical conditions (Nanda et al., 2018). Global renewable energy research efforts have been concentrated on increasing the lipid content in microalgae and the effective culturing of algae. In order to establish the potential of microalgae biomass as an alternative for the production of biofuels, more concentrated attempts are needed for detailed characterization of algae biomass, algae oil and algae biodiesel as very little information in literature is available on the same (Chowdhury et al., 2019).

The present study deals with three different species of algae i.e. Chlorella, Spirulina and pond water algae in order to assess their potential for biodiesel production. The natural pond water algae biomass is expected to be a cheaper feedstock for biodiesel production as compared to pure cultures of Chlorella and Spirulina (Khoo et al., 2019). The growth patterns of the three algae species would be studied with the aim of determining the maximum productivity of algae species (Mu et al., 2017). The algae biofuel production would be attempted via oil extraction and transesterification both in single stage and two stage reactor units in order to get the maximum biodiesel yield (Yew et al., 2019). The present work would investigate the usefulness of techniques like FTIR, NMR, GC and proximate and elemental analyses to understand the chemical properties of algae biomass, algae oil and algae biodiesel. The fuel properties of algae biodiesel would also be investigated (Loftus and Johnson, 2017). The results would then be compared with that of karanja biodiesel and conventional diesel in order to establish the potential of algae biomass for biodiesel production (Laurens et al., 2017).

Problem Statement

The reason for the study is to find an alternative source of fuel instead of the non-renewable sources. The use of non-renewable sources are the major sources of the extreme weather conditions and the rise in the sea level (Carneiro et al., 2017). Algae is a third-generation biofuel and the reason for choosing it as a source of biofuel is that it is abundant in the environment and its replacement of the first and second-generation biofuels (Tu et al., 2017). The presence of algae poses as a threat to the growth of plants in the water bodies as a result of algal blooms. Therefore, there is no threat to the environment by using algae as a source of biofuel (Baudry et al., 2018).

The characterization and analysis of algae and biofuel products and also its comparison to conventional diesel and many other algae species (Pal et al., 2019).

Aim and Objectives

The aim of this study is to analyze and characterize algae and biofuel products with the following objectives;

  • Objective 1: Analysis and characterization of algae for optimum production of locally produced biofuel.
  • Objective 2:  Analysis and characterization of biofuel from two different algae species with high lipid yields.

 

Research Questions

The identified research questions for this project are provided below:

  • How do we analyze the chemical properties of algae oil, algae biomass and algae biofuel?
  • How do we determine the maximum productivity of the chosen algae species?
  • How does the biofuel products from the chosen algae species compare to the conventional fuel?

 

Deliverables

The deliverables of these project are a project report, samples of the synthesized products and gotten results. The synthesized products would be tested according to industry standards and literature to see how they compare with required standards.  Also, the report should contain a complete documentation of how the laboratory experiment was carried out, how the various algae biomass and biofuel products were characterized, how various process variables were gotten, how the desired products were synthesized and how the results were arrived at.

Relevance

The global craving for bioenergy as replacement for petroleum fuel on the grounds of sustainability, renewability and carbon neutral alternative cannot be realistically achieved with the use of oil crops (Kumar et al., 2020).  Oil-rich microalgae have been reported by many to be a promising alternative source of lipids for biofuel production (Varela et al., 2020).

This study is majorly focused on characterizing certain algae species as a viable source of third generation biofuel production (Elegbede et al., 2017).

Methodology

This project focuses on secondary research, laboratory experiments and process analysis, and they are discussed below:

Secondary research

The secondary research in this project will utilize a systematic approach (Johnson et al., 2016) to review the works of literature. The steps involved in the systematic review of the literature are provided below:

  • Step 1: Identify the research questions that can be used for the project.
  • Step 2: Identify the keywords that should be used to research the works of literature.
  • Step 3: Extract the journals and books that are appropriate for this project.
  • Step 4: Write the literature review chapter.

Laboratory experiments

The laboratory experiments would cover a large chunk of this project. They would be carried out in stages, and as such described below;

  • Stage 1:  Sourcing for the required feedstock (the chosen algae) and other required raw materials.
  • Stage 2:   Characterization of the various biomass
  • Stage 3:  Developing an appropriate process route and optimal equipment arrangement for an efficient process setup (Photaworn et al., 2017)
  • Stage 4:  Carrying out the process reaction.
  • Stage 5:  Analyzing the process reaction.
  • Stage 6:  Carrying out the phase separation.
  • Stage 7:  Characterization of the resultant biofuels.
  • Stage 8:  Results Testing.

Process Analysis

The totality of the process reaction would be analyzed and this would also occur in stages;

  • Stage 1:  Process Testing
  • Stage 2:  Process Control
  • Stage 3:  Process Optimization

Evaluation

The risk assessment conducted for this project is provided in the table below:

Table 1:  Risk assessment

Risk

Impact

Mitigation Plan

Inability to meet the deadline

Low

Get an extension from the supervisor in due time

Inability to get required process inputs

High

Refer to municipalities, research institutes and laboratory technicians for help

Inability to develop the process set up

High

Refer to laboratory technicians for help

Insufficient data

High

Refer to journals and textbooks for help

 

Schedule

Table 2: Project Plan

Task Name

Start Date

End Date

Duration (Days)

Initial Research

23/09/2021

07/10/2021

14

Proposal

07/10/2021

28/10/2021

21

Secondary Research

28/10/2021

07/12/2021

40

Introduction Chapter

07/12/2021

12/12/2021

5

Literature Review Chapter

12/12/2021

05/01/2022

24

Methodology Chapter

05/01/2022

17/01/2022

12

Sourcing of Required Feedstock

17/01/2022

15/03/2022

60

Presentation 1

15/03/2022

23/03/2022

8

Laboratory Experiments

23/03/2022

06/04/2022

14

Evaluation of Gotten Results

06/04/2022

13/04/2022

7

Discussion Chapter

13/04/2022

23/04/2022

10

Evaluation Chapter

23/04/2022

28/04/2022

5

Conclusion Chapter

28/04/2022

30/04/2022

2

Project Management Chapter

30/04/2022

01/05/2022

2

Abstract and Report compilation

01/05/2022

03/05/2022

2

Report Proofreading

03/05/2022

13/05/2022

10

Presentation 2

13/05/2022

23/05/2022

10

 

References

Alizadeh, R., Lund, P.D. and Soltanisehat, L., 2020. Outlook on biofuels in future studies: A systematic literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews134, p.110326.

Andersson, V., Heyne, S., Harvey, S. and Berntsson, T., 2020. Integration of algae?based biofuel production with an oil refinery: Energy and carbon footprint assessment. International Journal of Energy Research44(13), pp.10860-10877.

Araújo, K., Mahajan, D., Kerr, R. and Silva, M.D., 2017. Global biofuels at the crossroads: an overview of technical, policy, and investment complexities in the sustainability of biofuel development. Agriculture7(4), p.32.

Baudry, G., Macharis, C. and Vallée, T., 2018. Can microalgae biodiesel contribute to achieve the sustainability objectives in the transport sector in France by 2030? A comparison between first, second and third generation biofuels though a range-based Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis. Energy155, pp.1032-1046.

Bos, K. and Gupta, J., 2018. Climate change: the risks of stranded fossil fuel assets and resources to the developing world. Third World Quarterly39(3), pp.436-453.

Carneiro, M.L.N., Pradelle, F., Braga, S.L., Gomes, M.S.P., Martins, A.R.F., Turkovics, F. and Pradelle, R.N., 2017. Potential of biofuels from algae: Comparison with fossil fuels, ethanol and biodiesel in Europe and Brazil through life cycle assessment (LCA). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews73, pp.632-653.

Chowdhury, H. and Loganathan, B., 2019. Third-generation biofuels from microalgae: a review. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry20, pp.39-44.

Chowdhury, H., Loganathan, B., Mustary, I., Alam, F. and Mobin, S.M., 2019. Algae for biofuels: The third generation of feedstock. In Second and Third Generation of Feedstocks (pp. 323-344). Elsevier.

Elegbede, I., Matemilola, S., Kies, F., Fadeyi, O., Saba, A., De Los Rios, P., Adekunbi, F., Lawal-Are, A. and Fashina-Bombata, H., 2017. Risk analysis and development of algae biofuel from aquatic and terrestrial systems. Energy Procedia128, pp.324-331.

Giakoumis, E.G., 2018. Analysis of 22 vegetable oils’ physico-chemical properties and fatty acid composition on a statistical basis, and correlation with the degree of unsaturation. Renewable energy126, pp.403-419.

Iqbal, A., Zan, F., Liu, X. and Chen, G.H., 2019. Integrated municipal solid waste management scheme of Hong Kong: a comprehensive analysis in terms of global warming potential and energy use. Journal of Cleaner Production225, pp.1079-1088.

Johnson, D., Deterding, S., Kuhn, K.A., Staneva, A., Stoyanov, S. and Hides, L., 2016. Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet interventions, 6, pp.89-106.

Khoo, C.G., Dasan, Y.K., Lam, M.K. and Lee, K.T., 2019. Algae biorefinery: Review on a broad spectrum of downstream processes and products. Bioresource technology292, p.121964.

Kumar, M., Sun, Y., Rathour, R., Pandey, A., Thakur, I.S. and Tsang, D.C., 2020. Algae as potential feedstock for the production of biofuels and value-added products: Opportunities and challenges. Science of the Total Environment716, p.137116.

Laurens, L.M., Chen-Glasser, M. and McMillan, J.D., 2017. A perspective on renewable bioenergy from photosynthetic algae as feedstock for biofuels and bioproducts. Algal Research24, pp.261-264.

Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Bergquist, P., Gustafson, A., Ballew, M.T. and Goldberg, M., 2020. Politics and global warming: november 2019.

Loftus, S.E. and Johnson, Z.I., 2017. Cross-study analysis of factors affecting algae cultivation in recycled medium for biofuel production. Algal Research24, pp.154-166.

Mu, D., Ruan, R., Addy, M., Mack, S., Chen, P. and Zhou, Y., 2017. Life cycle assessment and nutrient analysis of various processing pathways in algal biofuel production. Bioresource technology230, pp.33-42.

Nanda, S., Rana, R., Sarangi, P.K., Dalai, A.K. and Kozinski, J.A., 2018. A broad introduction to first-, second-, and third-generation biofuels. In Recent advancements in biofuels and bioenergy utilization (pp. 1-25). Springer, Singapore.

Negm, N.A., Abou Kana, M.T., Youssif, M.A., Mohamed, M.Y., Biresaw, G. and Mittal, K.L., 2017. Biofuels from Vegetable Oils as Alternative Fuels: Advantages and Disadvantages290. In Surfactants in Tribology (pp. 289-367). CRC Press.

Pal, P., Chew, K.W., Yen, H.W., Lim, J.W., Lam, M.K. and Show, P.L., 2019. Cultivation of oily microalgae for the production of third-generation biofuels. Sustainability11(19), p.5424.

Peter, S.C., 2018. Reduction of CO2 to chemicals and fuels: a solution to global warming and energy crisis. ACS Energy Letters3(7), pp.1557-1561.

Photaworn, S., Tongurai, C. and Kungsanunt, S., 2017. Process development of two-step esterification plus catalyst solution recycling on waste vegetable oil possessing high free fatty acid. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification118, pp.1-8.

Ruan, R., Zhang, Y., Chen, P., Liu, S., Fan, L., Zhou, N., Ding, K., Peng, P., Addy, M., Cheng, Y. and Anderson, E., 2019. Biofuels: introduction. In Biofuels: Alternative feedstocks and conversion processes for the production of liquid and gaseous biofuels (pp. 3-43). Academic Press.

Tu, Q., Eckelman, M. and Zimmerman, J., 2017. Meta-analysis and harmonization of life cycle assessment studies for algae biofuels. Environmental science & technology51(17), pp.9419-9432.

Varela Villarreal, J., Burgués, C. and Rösch, C., 2020. Acceptability of genetically engineered algae biofuels in Europe: opinions of experts and stakeholders. Biotechnology for biofuels13, pp.1-21.

Yew, G.Y., Lee, S.Y., Show, P.L., Tao, Y., Law, C.L., Nguyen, T.T.C. and Chang, J.S., 2019. Recent advances in algae biodiesel production: from upstream cultivation to downstream processing. Bioresource Technology Reports7, p.100227.

 

 

 

 

 

Last updated: Dec 01, 2021 05:26 PM

Do you need help with your academic work ? Let us help

AcademicianHelp

Your one-stop website for academic resources, tutoring, writing, editing, study abroad application, cv writing & proofreading needs.

Get Quote
TOP